EGOT received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
EGOT was created or significantly enhanced by WikiProject Reference Desk Article Collaboration, a project to leverage research efforts on the Reference Desks into a more lasting contribution to the encyclopedia. If you would like to help, please consider joining us. See original question.Reference Desk Article CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationReference Desk Article Collaboration
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Please remove Jamie Lee Curtis from the missing Tony Awards list of potential EGOT,because she was only nominated for a Grammy award buy didn't win. Thanks. 93.34.149.124 (talk) 06:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Offering a belated reply @Ifrit: I concur with your March 2024 observation that this article fails to explain the distinction between competitive and non-competitive awards before employing this nuance. I'd further contend that the article's current tone and structure overemphasizes the matter altogether. Winners are winners; the boundaries do not demand a competitive/non-competitive distinction. The larger table of EGOT winners already notes several nuanced distinctions among those achievements; surely an additional note could adequately specify the honorary awards among six EGOT winners. Indeed, the subsequent list (on Three competitive awards) makes the point with the "NCA" note. (Reusing the same notation throughout these lists would likely benefit the average/casual reader.) In short, the structural treatment of competitive/non-competitive awards merits serious reconsideration. — HipLibrarianshiptalk03:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support. I think the current title is a little too narrow. There is stuff in this article about PEGOT, REGOT, and EGOT equivalents outside US. The proposal makes more sense. --Quiz shows01:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
